Vietnam and Afghanistan: A Reminder and Jeremiad

Some compare the fall of Afghanistan to the Taliban to the fall of South Vietnam to the Communist North Vietnamese in 1975. There is one titanic difference. 

The United States had defeated North Vietnam, and this was sealed at the Paris Peace Accords. It was not an unwinnable war. But the victory had to be secured by keeping the peace, which mean giving ongoing US aid to South Vietnam. The US Congress (controlled by Democrats) refused do that, over the pleas of President Gerald Ford. Then Saigon fell. The Viet Cong took over South Vietnam. Millions fled or tried to flee. Remember the “boat people,” escaping yet another worker’s paradise? Vietnam became another Communist prison state that imprisoned, tortured, and killed untold numbers. Then, because South Vietnam fell, Cambodia fell to Pol Pot, another Communist (trained in France), who killed about two million of his own people for being counterrevolutionary. That was about 25%-30% of the population. Mao killed the most, 70,000,000, but Pol Pot holds the record for killing the highest percentage of his own people. They can argue in hell whose achievement was greater.

This may surprise you, since Vietnam has been falsely depicted by the press and in films. The war was procured to stop Communist aggression. It was not imperialism. What I write is true. America was humiliated without reason; it betrayed its allies; and it sentenced millions to tyranny and death. 

Today, the world faces something similar, but different. The war in Afghanistan was longer than the Vietnam war, but I’m not sure it was ever won. The US presence insured a more stable and more tolerant government. The war started because Afghanistan, controlled by the Taliban, gave save harbor to ben Ladin, the mastermind beyond the 9/11 attacks on America. That war had to be fought. 

However we assess all this, the armed forces departure from Afghanistan is an unmitigated disaster and human rights tragedy, sentencing the brave Afghan people to untold oppression and misery under a Taliban demonocracy. Joe Biden is the Commander in Chief. It is ultimately his fault. We can pray and we can welcome as many refugees to our shores and into our homes as possible. 

America is imploding at home and abroad. Our liberties are at stake, given the rise of statism and surveillance. Our taxes support abortion on demand. Our streets were ablaze and may be again. We have insecure borders. Our standing abroad is further blemished if not poisoned by the Afghanistan apocalypse. The Executive Branch is occupied by a radically incompetent man (or worse), who is failing mentally and falling America and falling the world. 

9 thoughts on “Vietnam and Afghanistan: A Reminder and Jeremiad

  1. An excellent analysis. Interesting to speculate who is controlling Biden and co, the large corporations, the institutions, and the educational establishment.

  2. Thanks. Douglas, appreciate your comments.

    I don’t know if you remember me, interested in apologetics, did sponsor you for talk many years ago at Denver Seminary.

    Worked with Norm Geisler at SES with the lecture series now in 27th year. Sure miss Norm.

    LORD bless you!

    Jerry Urban

    Sent from my iPad

  3. Sir, I thank you for this serious word of warning. I just finished reading Jeremiah and now Ezekiel. I shudder to think what Jerusalem was under David and now in day of Ezekiel. Apostasy can and does happen! The only answer. Christ or chaos. Keep up the good work N mayfield. CBTS 1962 PS. Have you written any thing on Critical Race Theory?

    – – – – – – – – – – – – Norman Mayfield 850-900-7571


  4. Pingback: Vietnam and Afghanistan: A Reminder and Jeremiad – MAD Production. Company.

  5. Sir thanks for a clear,concise article about our nation’s history and the comparison of other countries.
    Makes me appreciate America.
    Patrick Dowley

  6. It’s interesting to me that despite the differences in the situation, the ideological stream that screwed up our policies and actions in Southeast Asia is also the one that is screwing up our policies and actions in Southwest Asia. It raises so many questions:

    1. Has the ideology changed enough that their purpose is different, or are they still after the same thing?
    2. If their teleological motive is different, then what changed? If their teleological motive is the same, then what is it?
    3. Are their motives generally good and their strategies misguided, or are their motives generally subversive and their strategies simply effective to that end? Is it some combination of the two, where some people have evil motives and sell the strategy to the muddled-minded by trading on generally upright motives, and then blame their “failures” on their critics’ attempts to stop them?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s