Philosophy of Technology in Six Ideas

As I prowl around bookstores, I find a gaggle of books on managing technology overload. One after another fall of the presses and make their way on the shelves and into my hands. Some, I buy; most, I pass over. Often, I think, “I noticed that twenty years ago.” I did not predict Google or Facebook or Wikipedia, of course; but in my unread book, The Soul in Cyberspace, I did exegete the medium qua medium, noted some of the internet’s strengths, but warned of ways it could diminish the good life that God wants us to live. Here are six words that capture some of the insights I find repeated again and again in these new books.

  1. More is often less. Humans can profitably interact only with a limited amount of data and sensory stimulation. We must limit our exposure to internet (and all) electronic media because, unless we are careful, it will addle and unravel us. It may even stupefy us, even as we twitch and click away.
  2. The medium is the message. As Marshall McLuhan wrote 50 years ago, each communications media shapes its message according to the dictates of the form of communication. An image communicates differently than the spoken word, the spoken word, differently than the written word, and so it goes. Attending a worship service cannot be translated truthfully by watching it on line.
  3. Efficiency is overrated and may be dangerous. Many good things come slowly, such as strong and vibrant relationships, handcrafted furniture, and skill in playing a musical instrument. All too often, modern technology accelerates without regard to quality. Downloading a PDF of a book can be done quickly; but perhaps finding a hard copy and enjoying its un-electrified slowness is what you should do. It is more efficient to use a program to put comments on students’ papers. However, writing with pen and ink is more personal and embodied. Yes, it is slower—and better (if you have the time).
  4. Resist quantification over qualitative concerns. Technologies trade on numbers. How many likes did your Facebook post receive? People may like it for the wrong reasons. How many people follow your tweets? How can you maximize exposure to your blog? What is left behind, too often, is the quality–the objective nature–of what is available online. What might God think of your essay, your poem, or your cartoon? Does what you put on line contribute to human flourishing.
  5. Virtuous engagement online requires abstention. We often give too much of our time to the on line world. Our very souls are shaped by its speed, its fragmentation, its instantism. Thus, we are wise to retreat, to unplug, to desist, to desert it. Leave your phone in the car when you go shopping or when you meet a friend at a coffee shop. Designate hours and days when you are off line entirely. You will gain a new perspective on your on line life by going off line. You will notice what slipped into the background: friends, pets, nature, the Bible, prayer needs, and more.
  6. Every new communication technology gives and takes away. There is no sheer advantage. The telephone and radio extend the voice, but take away the physical presence. Early users of telephones were rattled by a disembodied voice coming from far away. The internet opens up the world to us, but may separate us from the people in our midst. Hence, “the absent presence” of much of life today. How can someone listen to you when they are texting someone elsewhere? Electronic music files make music available nearly anywhere, but the sound quality is worse than a record. And when you can listen to music through your ear buds in public, you will not be as aware of the world around you. You may not see the tears in a stranger’s eyes or hear a sound of distress in your midst.

My miniature essay fails to address the evil algorithms out there, the good and evil of big data, and other empirical matters worthy of concern. Nevertheless, my six ideas cover much of what is being written about today, twenty years after I warned about the down side of technologies. My inspiration was and is thinkers such as Neil Postman, Marshall McLuhan, Malcolm Muggerridge, and Jacques Ellul. Take some time away from Facebook, Instagram, et al, and read them, please.

 

6 thoughts on “Philosophy of Technology in Six Ideas

  1. Thank you for reminding me about entering into the cyber world unawares. I appreciate your comments and the wisdom to see it coming 20 years ago. Also I remember the pastor of my church in Columbine when I was doing my internship [1981] saying, “The medium is the message” [Marshall McLuhan] and it made some sense, but I’m not sure I completely understand what is meant by that statement. It has been around for years and many in my experience have quoted him.

  2. I agree with what you are presenting; however, in this day and and age, we are expected to be available with smart phones and smart TVs and lead our lives through them.

    I just heard on K-LOVE this morning that if a person can stay off their smart phones for one year, they will be rewarded with $100,000.

    Merry Christmas.

    Mercy

    • Of interest, I function without a smart phone. Never had one. I use a desk top computer exclusively and a land line for my phone. I do have a flip top trac phone that I use for emergencies or highly unusual situations. I know I am odd, and I don’t expect others to be as low mobile tech as me, but… some people are still managing without such things. Seeing people so attached to their smart phones only increases my desire to NOT have one.

  3. Thank you for these very thoughtful thoughts. You have challenged me to reduce my screen time and turn instead to things that matter more – as you said, friends, pets, prayer, the Bible. Quality over quantity.

  4. This is a great essay concerning a hugely important and largely neglected (by the major drivers of pop culture) topic This all seemed rather obvious to me 25 years ago and I did not need to read the books (I do read Postman & Ellul and like them a lot). The porn epidemic tarted as a direct result of the internet and now iPhones puts it in your pocket. It did not take much intelligence to figure that there could be no way that could have been good.
    I’ve had a flip-phone til last week, when sadly my new employer said I had to have an iPhone. Watching the world of clone-like people staring at their iPhones made me want to do the opposite, and I vowed never to get one of these idiotic devices. I’m getting rid of it the minute I can.

  5. rhoward@foulston.com

    On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:15 AM Douglas Groothuis, Ph.D. wrote:

    > Douglas Groothuis posted: “As I prowl around bookstores, I find a gaggle > of books on managing technology overload. One after another fall of the > presses and make their way on the shelves and into my hands. Some, I buy; > most, I pass over. Often, I think, “I noticed that twenty years” >

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s